Keep the exact terms in view.
A negotiator works with changing balances, expiring offers and incomplete information. A useful queue should explain what needs attention: missing intake, an unreviewed proposal, an expiration date or a funding assumption. A single score cannot explain the whole case.
A clearer path through offer review.
- Review the client’s debts and the recorded offer history. Keep each creditor proposal and revision distinct so the team can see how the terms changed.
- Use the negotiator desk to inspect the reason an item needs review. Check the offer’s expiration and the available funding scenario before proposing the next action.
- Bind customer acceptance to the exact offer version. Model an installment schedule with dates and cent-level totals, then require verified payment evidence before treating the settlement as complete.
What stays connected
Keep proposal, acceptance, installment schedule and verified payment as separate stages. An updated offer should retain the previous version; a creditor reply does not replace the client’s acceptance. The history should explain the next decision.
Current scope & remaining work
What you can explore today.
- Working preview
- Offer history, explainable review queue, local approval modeling and installment scenarios.
- Prepared backend
- Exact-terms checks, guarded stage transitions and reversal-aware completion tests.
- Connection work remaining
- Authenticated consent, provider-confirmed settlements and production reconciliation.
Does an offer in the system mean the debt is settled?
No. A proposal, customer acceptance, scheduled installment and verified payment are separate records. The product is being built to keep those distinctions visible.